[ntp:questions] Re: Ntpdate - socket in use
George Kaplan
nope at invalid.mynetwork
Tue Jan 13 05:49:47 UTC 2004
On 12 Jan 2004 04:47:05 -0800, mayer at gis.net (Danny Mayer) wrote:
>ephesys at myexcel.com (Isaac Grover) wrote in message news:<40019073.727185 at news.centennialpr.net>...
>The common solution is not to run ntpdate, just ntpd with the -g option.
>I don't know why the RedHat people did this in the startup, but there is
>no reason to run ntpdate any more.
Thanks for the info - I've chmod'd ntpdate to 000 so when I'm tempted to use it,
I can't. =)
Now for another problem. My WinXP client won't update its time from my ntpd
server, claiming: "An error occurred while Windows was synchronizing with
gibson. The time sample was rejected because: The peer's stratum is less than
the host's stratum."
My ntpq output is:
[root at gibson /etc]# ntpq -p -n
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
209.244.17.41 .INIT. 16 u - 64 0 0.000 0.000 4000.00
209.244.0.5 10.64.126.39 2 u 114 128 7 149.877 12.397 5.856
209.244.0.6 10.64.126.39 2 u 110 128 7 149.828 10.382 3.148
209.247.10.162 .INIT. 16 u - 64 0 0.000 0.000 4000.00
128.101.101.101 160.94.54.248 2 u 109 128 7 160.268 5.620 10.301
134.84.84.84 160.94.54.248 2 u 109 128 7 160.274 7.290 6.507
192.168.100.1 .INIT. 16 u - 64 0 0.000 0.000 4000.00
[root at gibson /etc]#
Gibson = 192.168.100.1 = ntpd server. Why is gibson set to stratum 16? Can
that be changed?
Thanks again,
Isaac
Isaac
Are you losing $14,200.00 per year without your knowledge?
http://bigmoneyandfreetime.web1000.com
More information about the questions
mailing list