[ntp:questions] Re: Errors with NMEA refclock
Danny Mayer
mayer at ntp.isc.org
Mon Jan 30 18:21:40 UTC 2006
David J Taylor wrote:
>
> You are, of course, correct. However, many devices /do/ allow higher
> speeds (which would provide lower timekeeping jitter), but there is no
> easy way to tell ntpd about the higher speed. I see that flag1 and flag4
> are unused for this driver, so that might be a way to pass the port number
> and baud rate under Windows. E.g. flag4 19200.
>
> (Perhaps the port number is implied already by the unit number in the
> address?)
>
> David
>
If the specific baud rate is defined in the spec then we shouldn't be
providing knobs to turn to change it.
Danny
More information about the questions
mailing list