[ntp:questions] Performance?
David Woolley
david at ex.djwhome.demon.co.uk.invalid
Tue Dec 23 20:42:22 UTC 2008
dhavey wrote:
> The performance is still really bad:
You still don't have PPS.
One of your other servers is in severe distress (stepping). Three of
the servers for the first machine, including GPS and the other statum 1
have been declared false tickers.
Do you really expect better than Windows performance?
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay
> offset jitter
> ==============================================================================
> x192.168.0.2 69.25.96.13 2 u 1 16 377 0.130
> 4.307 0.417
> 192.168.0.26 192.168.0.2 2 u 47 16 210 0.000 0.000
> 130.357
> 192.168.0.27 .STEP. 16 u - 16 0 0.000
> 0.000 0.000
> x192.168.0.29 .GPS. 1 u 11 16 376 0.086
> -199.29 0.172
> xGPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 4 16 377 0.000
> -220.73 2.039
>
>
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
> jitter
> ==============================================================================
> 192.168.0.26 192.168.0.2 2 u 13 16 42 0.007
> 15.204 0.409
> 192.168.0.27 192.168.0.29 2 u 1214 16 0 0.001
> 40.722 0.000
> 192.168.0.28 71.80.83.0 3 u 2 16 377 0.018
> 199.327 0.123
> *GPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 3 16 377 0.000
> 0.605 3.320
More information about the questions
mailing list