[ntp:questions] Performance?

David Woolley david at ex.djwhome.demon.co.uk.invalid
Tue Dec 23 20:42:22 UTC 2008


dhavey wrote:

> The performance is still really bad:

You still don't have PPS.

One of your other servers is in severe distress (stepping).  Three of 
the servers for the first machine, including GPS and the other statum 1 
have been declared false tickers.

Do you really expect better than Windows performance?

>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay
> offset  jitter
> ==============================================================================
> x192.168.0.2     69.25.96.13      2 u    1   16  377    0.130
> 4.307   0.417
>  192.168.0.26    192.168.0.2      2 u   47   16  210    0.000    0.000
> 130.357
>  192.168.0.27    .STEP.          16 u    -   16    0    0.000
> 0.000   0.000
> x192.168.0.29    .GPS.            1 u   11   16  376    0.086
> -199.29   0.172
> xGPS_NMEA(0)     .GPS.            0 l    4   16  377    0.000
> -220.73   2.039
> 
> 
>     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
> jitter
> ==============================================================================
>  192.168.0.26    192.168.0.2      2 u   13   16   42    0.007
> 15.204   0.409
>  192.168.0.27    192.168.0.29     2 u 1214   16    0    0.001
> 40.722   0.000
>  192.168.0.28    71.80.83.0       3 u    2   16  377    0.018
> 199.327   0.123
> *GPS_NMEA(0)     .GPS.            0 l    3   16  377    0.000
> 0.605   3.320




More information about the questions mailing list