[ntp:questions] Polling interval in FreeBSD vs. Windows
David Woolley
david at ex.djwhome.demon.invalid
Tue Jan 18 19:58:17 UTC 2011
unruh wrote:
> more responsive to frequecy shifts. Also ntpd's averaging time is NOT of
> the order of 100 poll intervals ( which you would need to get your order
Fair comment. However, it is still measuring the difference between a
filtered estimate of true time and an instantaneous measurement. It is
not measuring the difference between true time and the system clock
time, which is how a lot of people seem to treat it.
> of magnitude) Especially as ntpd uses only one of every 8 polls, the
> actual statistical improvement is less than 3, not an order of
> magnitude.
>
> No. a fast poll also corrects wander faster. ntpd is horribly slow at
> correcting wander, but doing it quickly corrects it faster. What it does
Depends whether the wander is in the clock or the measurement.
>> loop time constant will report higher offsets, but the time will
>> actually be more correct.
>
> sorry, but that is just wrong. The offsets are the best estimate of the
> "correct time" Higher offsets means higher errors.
The offsets are the difference between the best estimate of the correct
time, before it is updated, and the time from a specific, selected
measurement.
>
>
>> This may be complicated in that I'm not sure that the loop time constant
>> is actually clamped by the poll rate, so it is possible that setting a
>> high rate over samples without changing the overall behaviour. Maybe it
>> is clamped by maxpoll?
>
> No, it is determined by the number of readings, not by time. More
> readings in a given time means shorter time constant. Fewer readeings,
I am pretty certain that they are decoupled internally, and the degree
of over-sampling can vary. Essentially, though, it is the time constant
that is tuned, and the poll interval has to over sample that and the 1
out of 8 filter.
> longer. ntpd throws away 7 out of 8 readings, so the actual poll
> interval of used reading is 8 times as long as the set poll interval,
> and the time constant is about 5 times that if I remember correctly.
>
>
More information about the questions
mailing list