[ntp:questions] "ntpd[7602]: synchronized to"

E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists Null at BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid
Thu May 26 21:38:00 UTC 2011


Florin Andrei wrote:
> I'm a tad reluctant to tell the clients to use the entire
>  fleet of local NTP servers, albeit they are of similar
>  quality.  These 3 clients are members of a DB cluster
>  and it's more important to keep them in sync with each other,
>  rather than in sync with some abstract "true time".
>  So, if some local NTP servers start wondering off and
>  fracture the cluster time-wise, that's bad.
>  Hence the tendency to keep the config tight and small.
>
> Are there better approaches?

In addition to the clients using the local NTP servers,
  tos cohort 1 & peer prefer the 3 clients to each other?


-- 
E-Mail Sent to this address <BlackList at Anitech-Systems.com>
  will be added to the BlackLists.




More information about the questions mailing list