[ntp:questions] WARNING: someone's faking a leap second tonight

E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists Null at BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid
Sat Aug 4 00:18:13 UTC 2012


Jeffrey Lerman wrote:
> Can anyone demonstrate whether ntpd clears the bit if it
>  is set but an upstream server is configured and sends an
>  LI=00 update?

See: ntp_proto.c & ntp_timer.c ?

... and platform dependent stuff ?
 nt_clockstuff.c  e.g. "Disarm leap second only if the leap second is not already in progress"


Dev ver of the moment:
<http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-dev/ntp-dev-4.2.7p292.tar.gz>


-- 
E-Mail Sent to this address <BlackList at Anitech-Systems.com>
  will be added to the BlackLists.



More information about the questions mailing list