[ntp:questions] WARNING: someone's faking a leap second tonight
E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null at BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid
Sat Aug 4 00:18:13 UTC 2012
Jeffrey Lerman wrote:
> Can anyone demonstrate whether ntpd clears the bit if it
> is set but an upstream server is configured and sends an
> LI=00 update?
See: ntp_proto.c & ntp_timer.c ?
... and platform dependent stuff ?
nt_clockstuff.c e.g. "Disarm leap second only if the leap second is not already in progress"
Dev ver of the moment:
<http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-dev/ntp-dev-4.2.7p292.tar.gz>
--
E-Mail Sent to this address <BlackList at Anitech-Systems.com>
will be added to the BlackLists.
More information about the questions
mailing list