[ntp:questions] Any chance of getting bugs 2164 and 1577 moving?
David J Taylor
david-taylor at blueyonder.co.uk.invalid
Wed Mar 21 06:09:03 UTC 2012
"Harlan Stenn" <stenn at ntp.org> wrote in message
news:E1SA6uS-000Kpj-LY at stenn.ntp.org...
> David wrote:
>> 2164 needs discussion, unless altering the number of significant digits
>> in
>> the ntpq output wouldn't break anything. Do we need to have this
>> discussion? I have looked through ntpq.c, but I can't see where the
>> number of decimal digits in the output for offset is set.
>
> I'd be inclined to do what we do for sntp, which is drive the number of
> emitted digits based on the precision of the time.
>
> H
Yes, I agree that makes sense. I would wish to see at minimum the decimal
point and tenths of milliseconds. On the system I want to monitor, the
precision is reported as -19, but the offsets need at least four decimal
places of milliseconds to be plotted with reasonable accuracy (i.e. tenths
of microseconds are needed).
Cheers,
David
More information about the questions
mailing list