[ntp:questions] Thoughts on KOD
John Hasler
jhasler at newsguy.com
Tue Jul 8 03:12:04 UTC 2014
I wrote:
> Would it be useful to offer an "official" minimal implementation
> intended for embedded systems so that these people won't feel the need
> to code their own? Maybe add minimal NTP support to Busybox?
Brian Inglis writes:
> AIUI an updated v4 sntp client will be released to replace ntpdate.
> How about specifying the sntp core as an RFC for an embedded NTP
> client?
That would be even better. Designers could then claim they "have to"
use it to be standards compliant.
--
John Hasler
jhasler at newsguy.com
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
More information about the questions
mailing list