[ntp:questions] questions Digest, Vol 134, Issue 7

Sowmya Manapragada skoganty at gmail.com
Sat Dec 12 07:22:34 UTC 2015


Thanks all for your comments, but if that's expected , I need to depend on
something other than the system / peer status words for trapping the
correct  sequence of events?
what I mean is even when my server is not reachable and system status word
rv 0 = 0615 ..it means to the client (0 leap_none, 6- sync_ntp,1  event,
5-clock_sync).. and  only after 7 to 8 minutes rv 0 status changes and
gives the correct status that the "server peer" is unreachable, same with
the client associations status: only after 6 to 8  minutes  client shows it
has lost the server peer ( not reachable)  ..am I missing something here ?

thanks,
Shyam

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:30 PM, <questions-request at lists.ntp.org> wrote:

> Send questions mailing list submissions to
>         questions at lists.ntp.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         questions-request at lists.ntp.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         questions-owner at lists.ntp.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of questions digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Observation with ntp4.2.8 at p4-request inputs (brian utterback)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:01:14 -0500
> From: brian utterback <brian.utterback at oracle.com>
> To: elliott.ch at comcast.net, "'Sowmya Manapragada'"
>         <skoganty at gmail.com>,   questions at lists.ntp.org
> Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] Observation with ntp4.2.8 at p4-request
>         inputs
> Message-ID: <5669779A.7040507 at oracle.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Yes, that is the expected behavior.
>
> On 12/10/2015 6:55 AM, Charles Elliott wrote:
> > FWIIW, I have seen a similar phenomenon, only with one server.  If the
> time
> > server on my network stops dispensing time for some reason, the
> computers on
> > the LAN will still stay sync'ed to its last observation long after the
> reach
> > indicator goes to zero.  Not sure if that is right.
> >
> > Charles Elliott
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: questions
> > [mailto:questions-bounces+elliott.ch=comcast.net at lists.ntp.org] On
> Behalf Of
> > Sowmya Manapragada
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:26 PM
> > To: questions at lists.ntp.org
> > Subject: [ntp:questions] Observation with ntp4.2.8 at p4-request inputs
> >
> > Hello All,
> > Just wanted to check if what I am observing with4.2.8p4 is as expected
> or I
> > missed out something because I don't see this with older 4.2.8p2/p3 :I
> have
> > a client having 2 NTP servers (both servers in my LAN ), client makes
> one as
> > a peer ( to which it is currently synced) and other as a candidate; the
> peer
> > (server) goes down, my client at least waited 7 to 8 min to reject this
> peer
> > server and choose the available one... Checked in Mein berg monitor tool
> > also and rv0 command ... The status word just don't show that client
> > rejected server until 7 to 8 minutes... Wire shark correctly shows no
> > packets exchanged between my clint and peer ( right from moment when
> server
> > which is down)..my client ntp.conf is standard with an iburst...
> > Thanks in advance
> > Shyam
> > _______________________________________________
> > questions mailing list
> > questions at lists.ntp.org
> > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > questions mailing list
> > questions at lists.ntp.org
> > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
>
> --
> Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
> Brian Utterback | Principle Software Engineer
> Phone: +1 6038973049 <tel:+1%206038973049>
> Oracle Systems/RPE Solaris Network
> 1 Oracle Dr. | Nashua, NH 03062
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All working systems eventually start to exhibit their own agenda
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to
> developing practices and products that help protect the environment
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> questions mailing list
> questions at lists.ntp.org
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of questions Digest, Vol 134, Issue 7
> *****************************************
>


More information about the questions mailing list