[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [questions] GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
On 23/06/2022 15:33, Thibaut HUMBERT wrote:
Hi David!
I tested with your dll:
https://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/x86/loopback-ppsapi-provider.zip
The PPS was not detected, I don't know what I did wrong.
Here is the content of my ntp.conf:
server 127.127.20.3 minpoll 2 maxpoll 2 mode 89 prefer
fudge 127.127.20.3 time2 0.125 refid NMEA
server 127.127.22.1 minpoll 2 maxpoll 2 true
fudge 127.127.22.1 refid uPPS
FYI, the pagehttps://kb.meinbergglobal.com/kb/time_sync/ntp/ntp_for_windows/using_pps_signals_on_windows was updated today, there is a new link to "serialpps-20120321-signed.zip".
Thibaut,
It's not "my" DLL, but one provided by Meinberg IIRC.
If you use the PPS you /must/ mark one of your other sources as "prefer".
Without that any PPS doesn't work.
I take it that my Serial Port LEDs program shows a flashing DCD (when NTPd is
stopped)?
Good to hear that there is an updated link.
--
Cheers,
David
Web: https://www.satsignal.eu
--
This is questions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: questions+subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: questions+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [questions] Re: GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- [questions] Re: GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] Re: GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] Re: GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?
- Re: [questions] GPS+PPS vs NTP server, why a huge offset ?